/* 배경화면 투명도 제거 설정 */

[ACC 2012] IMPACT OF LIPID PROFILES AND CLASSICAL RISK FACTORS ON CORONARY ARTERY SPASM AS ASSESSED BY ACETYLCHOLINE PROVOCATION TEST

Diagnostic Testing: ECG Exercise and Sports

IMPACT OF LIPID PROFILES AND CLASSICAL RISK FACTORS ON CORONARY ARTERY SPASM AS ASSESSED BY ACETYLCHOLINE PROVOCATION TEST

  • Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, South Korea, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  Open Archive

Background

Dyslipidemia can be associated with endothelial dysfunction and subsequent cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether the dyslipidemia and classical coronary risk factors can negatively impact on coronary artery spasm (CAS) by intracoronary acetylcholine (Ach) provocation test.

Methods

A total 3,034 consecutive patients (pts) underwent Ach provocation test by incremental doses of 20, 50, 100 ug into the left coronary artery were enrolled. Significant CAS was defined as focal or diffuse severe transient luminal narrowing (>70%) with or without chest pain or ST-T change on ECG. Traditional coronary risk factors and lipid profiles were compared between the CAS negative group (n=1789) and CAS positive group (n=1245).

Results

Baseline clinical characteristics showed that male gender, elderly, diabetes, smokers and myocardial bridge on angiogram were more frequently found in CAS positive group. Interestingly, HDL-cholesterol was associated with positive CAS, but not total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride. In multivariate analysis, male gender, old age, diabetes, and myocardial bridge remained significant but there was a trend in impact of smoking on CAS. HDL-cholesterol was consistently associated with positive CAS (table).

Table.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and lipid profiles between Non-CAS and CAS.

Variables. N (%)Non-CAS (n = 17S9)CAS (n = 1245)P valueP value*OR(95% CI)
Gender (male)523 (42.0)934 (52.2)< 0.0010.0061.339 (1.089–1.648)
Age, year52.72 + 13.3655.83 ± 11.56< 0.001< 0.0011.029 (1.021–1.036)
Hypertension560 (45.0)853 (47.7)0.1420.3910.933 (0.798–1.092)
Diabetes141 (11.3)244 (13.6)0.0600.0481.314 (1.003–1.723)
Smoking321 (25.S)579 (32.4)< 0.0010.0601.249 ((0.991–1.574))
Current alcohol347 (28.1)565 (31.8)0.0310.5971.049 (0.717–1.537)
Myocardial bridge147 (11.8)475 (2S.6)< 0.001< 0 0012.711 (2.161–3.402)
Total Cholesterol, mg/dl
Triglyceride, mg/dl130.62±92.95134.57±95.020.2980.4761.000 (0.999–1.001)
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dl115.95±32.1011441±34.900.2930.5440.999 (0.997–1.002)
HDL-cholesterol-mg/dl52.61±13.7450.40 ±12.87< 0.0010.0360.993 (0.987–1.000)

P value;

*

adjusted by gender, age, diabetes, smoking, current alcohol, myocardial bridge.

Conclusions

In our study, we found that male, elderly, diabetes, presence of myocardial bridge, and HDL-cholesterol were main predictors of endothelial dysfunction and subsequent CAS as assessed by Ach provocation test.

ACC Moderated Poster Contributions

McCormick Place South, Hall A

Sunday, March 25, 2012, 9:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.

Session Title: Does the Exercise ECG Have a Role in 2012?

Abstract Category: 25. Diagnostic Testing: ECG Exercise

Presentation Number: 1155-453

추천 0 공유 · 더보기 목록

댓글 0